U.S. society obsessed with safety

The U.S. is grossly obsessed with safety and regulations to the point that our liberty is in jeopardy and our rights are compromised.

By Essie HarrisThe Guardsman

The  U.S. is grossly obsessed with safety and regulations to the point that  our liberty is in jeopardy and our rights are compromised.

This  country is ignoring the wisdom of one of our great founding fathers,  Benjamin Franklin, who wrote that those who would give up essential  liberty for a little safety deserve neither and will lose both.

This liberty does not only include the things we like, but also things we stigmatize, like cigarettes.

First  smoking was banned from restaurants, then parks, then 20 feet from  buildings, and now in some communities like San Luis Obispo and  Berkeley, it is being banned altogether.

Smokers  are harassed and treated like second rate citizens. Tobias Medina  described his disgust for this habit in a letter to the editor,  published in The Guardsman March 9, and went as far to compare smokers  to rapists, murders and heroin users. Medina exaggerated the threat of  second hand smoke and insinuated City College police should compromise  combating more legitimate threats on campus to enforce no-smoking rules.

We all know the negative impact of smoking, but what is the negative impact of banning it?

Studies  done by the National Cancer Society show indirect relationships between  cancer and stress. By obsessively trying to pin-point and eliminate  causes of death we are replacing our quality of life and liberty for the  illusion of quantity, but in reality we are receiving neither.

According  to the International Agency for Research on Cancer 38.2 per 100,000 die  from lung cancer in the United States. Mexico’s lung cancer death rate  is less than half that of the U.S., with 13.4 per 100,000 deaths.  Interestingly, 28 percent of Mexicans smoke cigarettes on a daily basis  compared to 16 percent in the U.S. If we are smoking less, why is cancer  affecting us more?

Other  countries with a lower rate of lung cancer also include Chile,  Argentina, Costa Rica, Panama and Paraguay. None of these countries  enforce smoking laws as strongly as the U.S. does.

This  country’s manic craving for safety doesn’t stop with smoking laws. Our  freedom is diminishing before our eyes and we are too scared to realize  it. I can’t even eat a meal without having the nutrition information  shoved down my throat, and personally, I would rather eat my meal guilt  free. Helmet laws, seat belt laws, no running, no drinking after 2 a.m.,  no open containers – why?

Normally  I use common sense with things like not putting my child in the cart at  Trader Joe’s when it goes up the very cool cart escalator, but thank  god I have a sign to clarify that it is potentially dangerous. This  constant implementation of regulations has spawned my rebellious side.

I  have found myself intentionally acting recklessly with my morning  coffee, labeled “Use Caution, Hot Beverage.” I didn’t replace the  batteries in my fire alarm which is required by law and yes, I even  refused to wash my hands after using the rest room at the mall to spite  the “Wash Your Hand” signs posted on all ten mirrors.

Despite my dubious behavior, I seem to be just fine. My actions didn’t endanger my life or anyone else and I felt liberated.

So  this is for the bastard that sued McDonalds for getting fat, for the  deranged woman who wouldn’t take responsibility for spilling hot coffee  on her self, and for everyone else for allowing these silly warnings and  regulations to litter our beautiful country: Your hypochondria is  making me sick.

Email:
eharris@theguardsman.com