U.N. Libya vote illustrates power-shift

The days of the United States doing whatever the hell it wants as the world’s sole superpower are slowly coming to an end, and the UN Security Council’s resolution on intervention in Libya shows us why.

By Brant OzanichThe Guardsman

The  days of the United States doing whatever the hell it wants as the  world’s sole superpower are slowly coming to an end, and the UN Security  Council’s resolution on intervention in Libya shows us why.

The resolution was put before the fifteen-country UN Security Council on March 17 and needed at least nine votes to pass.

Although  the resolution passed with ten votes, the top four emerging world  economies and the largest economy in Europe – China, India, Russia,  Brazil and Germany– all abstained, disagreeing with military  intervention in the country.

The  four emerging countries, also known as “the BRIC countries,” are  speculated to dominate the world economy by the year 2050, according to a  widely acknowledged and continued study by Goldman Sachs over the past  ten years.

This  disagreement shows that these up-and-coming countries are no longer  afraid to openly disagree with the U.S. and other western powers on  collective foreign policy decisions.

The BRIC countries
These  four countries, which collectively make up 40 percent of the world’s  population and 25 percent of the world’s landmass, are capable of  forming a world economic order comparable to the current G7 that  dominates global trade.

All  the BRIC countries have been considered “developing” since the end of  the Cold War, but with their unified acceptance of capitalism and  globalization, they have seen recent spikes in population, GDP,  technological advancements, mass production and services.

China  alone is speculated to be equal in size to the U.S. economy by the  mid-2020s and more expansive by 2050. It recently passed Japan to become  the world’s second largest economy in absolute volume.

What abstention means
The  reluctance of these rising powers to support the west’s drive to  intervene shows they are ready to collectively stand up and oppose the  way the U.S. and Europe run international politics.

It  shows these four countries are not only gaining power and traction  economically, but are also not afraid to flex their influence  politically.

Former Brazilian president Luiz Lula da Silva condemned the military intervention, calling it “weak.”

“If  we had twenty-first century representation [in the Security Council],  instead of sending a plane to drop bombs, the UN would send its  secretary-general to negotiate,” he said.

Still,  their reluctance to vote against the resolution — or even veto it,  which Russia or China could have done — shows the countries are not  strong enough politically to completely oppose the West’s actions, yet.

Although  the BRIC countries were unified in their abstention in the Security  Council, their domestic reactions to the Libyan conflict vary.

China  has been censoring and fabricating news about Libya and the rest of the  Middle East protests to reduce the chances of resistance forming at  home. The other BRIC countries denounced Muammar Khadafi’s military  repression but believe there are better solutions than western military  intervention.

“I  would like to re-emphasize that India continues to be gravely concerned  about deteriorating humanitarian situation in Libya,” Manjeev Singh  Puri, India’s deputy envoy to the UN, said in a statement released after  the vote. “We call on the Libyan authorities to cease fire, protect the  civilian population and address the legitimate demands of the Libyan  people.”

Adapting foreign policy
The  former Brazilian president and Indian diplomat may in fact be right.  The leaders of this country need to take a step back and look at  alternate ways to enact policy and diplomacy abroad.

The  U.S. needs to revamp its collective security measures within UN and  NATO to include opinions of countries that will dominate global politics  in the years to come, instead of those who have dominated it in years  past.

Obama  and his allies in Europe should have questioned the abstention of these  rising powers and opened a discourse on alternative options, instead of  defying the reluctance of governments that represent such a large  portion of the world’s population.

The  way the world responded to Libya is just the beginning. In 20 or 30  years the U.S. will be struggling to keep its position as the most  powerful country on earth. It’s going to be a harsh reality for our  leaders when we reach that point, and they need to start preparing for  it now.

Email:
bozanich@theguardsman.com